The Fourth
Dimension
by Lindsay Lohan
You have probably heard people refer to the fourth
dimension before but maybe you weren't sure what they mean by it. Well, first lets
remember that we live in 3 dimensional space. How do we know? - We have three directions
of free movement:
1.) Left/Right
2.) Back/Forth

3.) Up/Down Up/Down Up/Down Up/Down
Because we have three possible directions, it will take three values to describe the
position of any point (x,y,z). In two dimensions, we only need two points: (x,y). In three
dimensions, I could tell you to go forward 8 feet, right 12 feet, then you reach a rope.
Climb up the rope 6 feet. Notice that each of these three directions are perpendicular to
each other... That means that any of the directions is its own and not combined of any of
the other directions. That means I can go forward or backward all I want but I won't be
going left or right, nor up or down. So if we were to consider a fourth dimension
(x,y,z,t), it would have to be a new perpendicular direction in addition to the three
directions we have free movement in.
Considering the Fourth Dimension:
Often it is helpful to visualize the way dimensions increase when considering the fourth
dimension. Examine the chart on the right. Notice that the zero dimension is represented
by a point, 1 dimensions is represented by a line, and 2 dimensions is represented by a
square. When we try to express three dimensions on a flat surface, like your computer
screen, we draw two squares and diagonal lines connecting the vertices. It represents a
cube, but it is not actually a cube. So perhaps when we draw a 4 dimensional cube, we can
draw two cubes and connect the diagonal vertices. That figure is called a hypercube. Keep
in mind that trying to express a 4 dimensional hypercube on a 2 dimensional surface is not
very helpful. But it at least helps you understand the kind of progression going on.
Visualizing 4th dimensional objects is not important if you merely want do some simple
computations. For instance, in 3 dimensions, the volume of a sphere is 4/3(pi)r^3, however
the hypervolume of a 4 dimensional hypersphere is determined by 1/2(pi^2)r^4.
Using Analogy to understand the 4th dimension:
Since it is hard to try to directly picture the fourth dimension in our minds,

perhaps using analogy can help us. In 1884, Edwin Abbot
wrote a book called "Flatland". The book writes about A. Square and his world,
Flatland. You may have already guessed, but Flatland is a 2 dimensional, flat plane and A.
Square is a square shaped guy who lives there. He has two dimensions of free movement. He
can go left/right and back/forth, however because he is restricted to his 2 dimensional
Flatland plane, he cannot go up/down off the plane. By analogy, we humans are restricted
to our "plane" of existence... and it would be impossible for us to freely move
in the fourth dimension. Let's go back to A. Square again. Note that A. Square can only
see what lies in his plane of existence, which means if a 3 dimensional sphere were to
pass through Flatland, A. Square would not see the sphere, but just 2 dimensional
"slices". Taking this further, imagine if a sphere passed halfway through
Flatland but stopped in the middle. the sphere would interesect Flatland as just one
circle and A. Square could see it! Furthermore, imagine if as the sphere approaches
Flatland, A. Square watches as the sphere slowly moves through his plane. What would A.
Square see? Recall that A. Square can only see 2-d slices of the sphere (or circles) so
what A. Square would percieve is a circle suddenly appearing, then growing... then
reaching a maximum size as the sphere was halfway through and as it exited, the circle
would grow smaller until it disappeared. This means that 3d objects could be explained to
a 2d being as a bunch of "slices stacked" on top of each other. Try to imagine
taking a bunch of circles and stacking them. They would begin to form a skeleton framework
of the actual 3d image. Similarly if a 4d hypersphere would intersect our plane of
existence, we would see a 3d sphere appear out of no where. It would grow until the
hypersphere was halfway through, then it would shrink back to nothing. Theoretically, we
could stack these spheres to form a hypersphere, but we can't stack them in the usual
sense, but rather it would have to extend in the fourth dimension which takes us back to
the original dilemma of trying to visualize it.
Some more curiousities:

If we look down upon a square in a flat, 2d plane, we can see the entire object a single
glance. Only one perspective is needed. In fact, we could place our finger inside the
object without touching the sides. This would be a profound feat for A. Square, a creature
inhabiting Flatland. His house is one big square and he can't just put his finger in the
middle of the house without first "entering" through a door on one of the sides.
Analogously, fourth dimensional beings have the ability to visualize an entire cube at one
glance. Humans can only visualize one half the cube at any given second. Also, four
dimensional beings could easily put their finger inside a closed cube without penetrating
its sides. Other curiousities involve mirror images. Imagine A. Square again. But now,
lets pick him up off Flatland and put him back into the plane upside down. He would now be
the mirror image of his old self. It is a bit tricky to imagine a human becoming a mirror
image of themself since we are unfamiliar with the fourth dimension rotation needed.
Conclusions:

Ultimately, it is best to think of the fourth dimension analogously. Considering that the
3rd dimension is a "new direction" to A. Square, we realize that the 4th
dimension is a kind of new direction to us. To say that we don't have free access to it,
it not to say we are in no way effected by it.
One of the biggest mis-conceptions about the fourth dimension
is that the fourth dimension is an alternate reality. Other misconceptions is that the
fourth dimension is completely separate from where we are today. Much like a 2 dimensional
plane can exist within our 3 dimensional universe, our 3d universe lies within a 4
dimensional realm. This does not mean we are fourth dimension either. Much like if I were
to put a 2 dimensional plane inside a 3 dimensional box, the plane is within the 3d box
but the plane is still 2 dimensional. What we should be concerned about when considering
that our universe lies within 4 dimensional space, is what correlations do we make?
Another big misconception is time travel. People confuse the words light speed, 4th
dimension, time, space, gravity. While Einstein considered that the time is the effect of
our 3d universe passing through the fourth dimension, it is not correct to make
assumptions regarding the ability to "time travel". Einstein furthermore
regarded time as being relative so without absolute time, time travel (in the conventional
sense) becomes even more questionable. The point I am trying to make is that time travel
would not consist of a stroll down 4th dimension lane.
Time travel has more to do with the relationship of space and time regarding our speed.
Theoretically, Einstein said, if we could go at the speed of light, while our speed is not
infinite to an observer, that we would have the effect of going any amount of distance in
an instant. The problem with overcoming this is that as matter's speed approaches the
speed of light, it gains in mass, ultimately making is even harder to go faster. Some
people like to regard this as nature's way of preventing us from messing with her laws.

Speculation is the first step to discovery. One should not be discouraged. First we must
consider what we know, then make speculalations on the unknown.
|